🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," said the MEP supporting the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are secure and fit for minors," stated a leading peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is largely happening at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are less and less willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.